Your next client asks an assistant first.
Monthly monitoring and focused implementation keep your firm crawlable, accurate, and easier for assistants to verify.
AI Visibility Care
Available with an active TMN Site Care plan. Site Care starts at $50 per month.
A monthly check, with time to act.
The plan includes up to 2 total studio hours across monitoring, diagnosis, communication, reporting, and implementation. I use that time on the highest-priority issue or improvement.
- Up to 2 total studio hours each month
- Unused time does not roll over
- Additional work is quoted before it begins
- No ranking, citation, or recommendation is guaranteed
Existing websites not built or previously audited by TMN begin with a one-time $750 baseline audit and setup.
Ask about AI visibilityBoring fundamentals, done properly.
There is no secret file and no magic markup. The firms that get cited are the ones a machine can reach, parse, and corroborate. Below is what the allowance can be spent on. It is a menu of possible work, not a checklist run every month.
Access and indexing
Crawler access across the major engines and assistants. OpenAI states that allowing OAI-SearchBot helps make content eligible to be surfaced and cited in ChatGPT Search. Sitemaps and IndexNow can help participating search engines discover changes sooner.
Structured data and entity facts
Organization, Person, Service, Article, and LocalBusiness markup kept accurate as facts change. I edit the properties you control. For third-party profiles and directories I provide the corrections and submit them where I have access.
The highest-priority item that fits
Each month the time goes to the single most valuable issue or improvement. Sometimes that is a page or answer section. Sometimes diagnosis, an indexing problem, or a wrong entity fact takes the whole allowance, and that is the right call when it happens.
Evidence and a short record
Search Console, Bing AI performance reporting, and assistant referral traffic reviewed as the month's questions call for it, plus a concise written record of findings, changes, and opportunities.
A prospect found this studio through ChatGPT.
A recent prospect told me they found TMN through ChatGPT and arrived with the published pricing already in hand. That happened here before I ever sold this service to anyone.
“Who is a good financial advisor for Google employees with a lot of RSUs?”A real kind of buyer question, asked inside an assistant.
I cannot make a model recommend you.
Anyone promising a ranking inside an assistant is selling something they do not control. Outputs vary by model, prompt, index, location, and day. I would rather draw the line now than in month 3.
- Discoverability, whether assistants can reach you
- Machine understanding of who you are and who you serve
- Citation eligibility, whether you qualify to be quoted
- Entity accuracy across the sources describing you
- Content freshness and how quickly changes are found
- Favorable treatment by any model
- A ranking, a citation, or a recommendation
- Which firms appear alongside you
- Traffic or lead volume
- Stability as models change retrieval and training
What is measurable, and what is not
- Reported
Bing Webmaster Tools reports sampled and aggregated citation data, the pages cited, and grouped grounding queries. It shows presence and direction, not a complete log of what anyone typed.
- Reported
Referral traffic. Referral links from ChatGPT Search include its tracking parameter, so those visits are identifiable in analytics.
- Reported
Search Console for impressions, queries, and indexing status, which still underpin most of how this works.
- Directional
A fixed prompt panel. The same buyer questions asked across the major assistants. Useful as a trend, never as proof. Results vary by prompt, location, and day, and the record says so every time.
What I will not sell you
Google does not require a special AI schema type or machine-readable file for its AI features. I maintain accurate standard structured data and will not repackage it as a separate invention. I will publish an llms.txt because it is cheap and some tools read it, but it belongs in housekeeping, not on an invoice.
Your compliance reviewer stays in the workflow.
Much of an adviser's public website can fall within the SEC Marketing Rule. Regulated copy remains subject to the firm's reviewer throughout the process.
I build inside that constraint. On recent financial-services work, a compliance consultant returned 11 items and every one went in, with the required disclosures placed word for word where requested. I do not give compliance advice and I do not replace your reviewer. Approved copy comes from your firm.
Start with the audit.
I will tell you what assistants can currently reach, what the platforms report is already being cited, and whether any of it is worth paying to change. If the answer is no, I will say so.